A Bowl Of Oatmeal A Day Is Equal To 4 Hours A Week of Jogging

4
5653

It’s the question which has plagued women for eons, and one which continues to elicit a plethora of answers ranging from the logical to the downright wacky: what is the key to living longer and healthier?

Well, for the past 30 years, Ingrid Fetkoeter has sought an answer to that very question. Fetkoeter, now 72 years old, dedicated herself to what has become the world’s largest and longest running research enterprise examining women’s health. Known as the Harvard Nurse’s Health Study, the work began back in 1976 and has since recruited some 126,000 female nurses to participate in its endeavor to examine the long-term risk factors for cardiovascular disease and cancer in women.

The culmination of this mammoth research effort is the publication of a “Risk Factors for Mortality” article, which enables health practitioners to compare different potentially fatal disorders and diseases against each other. 

The article examined 4,893 deaths from the participants of the Nurse’s Health Study between 1986 and 2004, finding that 1,026 were due to cardiovascular disease, 931 from smoking-related cancers, 1,430 from cancers not related to smoking, and 1,506 from “all other causes”.

The study used these death causes and series of factors to create a matrix whereby the risk of mortality for a given woman can be calculated. These factors included age, body mass index, weight change, height, current smoking and pack-years of smoking, glycemic load, cholesterol intake, systolic blood pressure and use of blood pressure medications, diabetes, and time since menopause.

While a trifle on the depressing side, the article provides useful insights into what is most likely to lead to early death in women, and therefore what can be done to avoid those causes and lengthen your lifespan.

While cancer as a whole was responsible for the highest mortality rates, the single most common cause of death was found to be heart disease. For this reason, it was perhaps unsurprising to learn from the study that dietary cholesterol consumption was a significant risk factor for mortality. Taken out of context, however, this might be misleading, as cholesterol is an important component of a healthy body, and in the right ratios of LDL to HDL can ensure robust cardiovascular health. What these results tell us, however, is that a lifestyle associated with high cholesterol intake (presumably due to excessive consumption of fried or fast foods) elevates a lady’s risk of stepping into an early grave.

The second leading cause of death in women was found to be smoking-related cancer. Once again, not an overly surprising finding, and one which requires only a small leap of logic to guess how this risk factor is lowered: give up smoking!

One interesting discovery as part of the study, however, was the protective behavior associated with fiber consumption. Researchers found that eating fiber equivalent to a cup of oatmeal each day appeared to extend a woman’s life the same amount as four hours of jogging a week. While this is no excuse to give up your afternoon run in exchange for a bowl of oatmeal each morning, it shows how important fiber is for healthy living and, of course, longer living.

Nuts were shown by the study to have a similarly magical impact on women’s health, with just two handfuls of nuts per week being equivalent to four hours per week of jogging. Just make sure they’re raw, unsalted, unoiled nuts (and NOT peanuts!), and you’re away laughing.

Call to Action: If you’re interested in finding out more about what lowers the life expectancy of the fairer sex, check this out.

– Liivi Hess

 

4 COMMENTS

  1. Elsewhere I sometimes read (from reliable sources!) peanuts are equivalent to tree nuts though they belong to an entirely different kind of plant. Probably various kinds of plants face the same evolutionary pressures and thus give their seeds similar sets of nutrients. Thus, I wonder what the reason here is for downgrading these seemingly healthy seeds. What is the source for the evidence supporting this rejection of the peanut?

  2. Would be very good to know why peanuts of all nuts are to be avoided as I use to eat a huge amount of peanut butter and would still like to. I do however still eat a huge amount of oatmeal (thank heavens) and I’m lucky as my 180 degrees turn around diet is proving helpful in me fighting any onset of the disease Scleroderma (SSc) a recent diagnosis of the antibody. But the peanuts would be good to know why it should be avoided! Anyone can enlighten us please?!!!

  3. Mold is the reason peanuts should be avoided. Aflatoxin, a poison produced by the fungus Aspergillus flavus, grows on peanuts and cereals, can cause certain types of cancers. Looked it up. Ever see discolored shells, nuts. They’re stored in large warehouses for long periods of time, dampness, etc. Recalls on some brands of nuts because of some kind of life threatening illness, not too many years ago. If your dealing with a skin problem may be better to give it up, but all is not lost. Almond or cashew butter is good, use raw nuts, I make my own with a powerful blender, B. with a little jar with a scrapper, you don’t have to add any oil. If you must indulge occasionally, buy the natural PB without soybean oil or you have a double whammy against it. I like to go for the least number of ingredients, that goes for most things at the supermarket. Chunky on a spoon, yummy, but think of what it does to you. Try to limit it

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here